Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vague relationship

:{{la|Vague relationship}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Vague relationship}})

Dictionary definition; neologism. IP contested prod2.

Possible WP:COATRACK spam for the website "Thought Catalog". OSborn ^arf_contribs. 18:44, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- OSborn ^arf_contribs. 18:45, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• Delete It does share a title with Megan Boyle's piece, but that's far more entertaining. As this stands, 'dictionary definition' is a possibility, as is essay. Possibly also Original Research as there are no references. If it came to be reliably referenced, I'd be prepared to change my mind. Unfortunately, the vague relationship is usually never referred to by name - or so I've found - but euphemisms and evasions are used. Peridon (talk) 19:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• Delete If this is an encyclopedia article then I'm a lamppost. It's an essay with no sources - WP:OR at its most trivial. Nwlaw63 (talk) 23:54, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable neologism. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.