Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valentina Zelyaeva

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:07, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Valentina Zelyaeva]]=

:{{la|Valentina Zelyaeva}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Valentina_Zelyaeva Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Valentina Zelyaeva}})

Pessimistic sigh* At this point these anachronistic, heinous-quality articles are like bed bugs. Inevitably people "on here" will contort themselves out of shape to try to say this model meets notability standards (because she exists, "but... Women Management!", there’s a few completely unsubstantiated buzz words and there’s a free image? Is that it? But hey, no one seriously wants to ameliorate "NMODEL"), so I have to ramble off everything don’t I. For 9 and a half years, there has been an unaddressed BLP template. When you actually try to find sources what do you get? "Model attends party in St. Tropez with other models hosted by a certain well-known modelizer", "model was airbrushed", that really pointless SI Swim Daily thing where all they do is post a bunch of Instagram photos of models who will never make it to the magazine. The Elle Russia link is a bunch of inane questions about her beauty routine with trivia at the bottom. They don’t even talk about what work she’s done at the very least. In the 3 sentences that pertain to jobs, the source, predictably and lazily, is Fashion Model Directory (not. a. reliable. source. A last resort at best.) And then the irrelevant quote about size with the nonexistent "TheSunDaily"? Do better. Trillfendi (talk) 21:53, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:26, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:27, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:27, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:27, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:07, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Delete - fails WP:GNG. Bondegezou (talk) 15:52, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.