Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vampirefreaks (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as relatively clear consensus. --JForget 18:04, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Vampirefreaks]]=

AfDs for this article:
    {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vampirefreaks}}

:{{la|Vampirefreaks}} ([{{fullurl:Vampirefreaks|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vampirefreaks (2nd nomination)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable, blatant advertising. Article was previously deleted. sixtynine • spill it • 00:09, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Weak keep Delete nn, ad, no claim of notability though a merge would be better if a clear target was available--very minor notability for its possible connection to a series of crimes. JJL (talk) 00:59, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep I found some news articles from major Canadian news sources [http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060914/vampire_freaks_060914/20060914?hub=CTVNewsAt11 CTV] [http://www2.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=765b7ad8-e00a-49a1-9d72-d3d35e5c2627 Vancouver Sun] [http://strokenews.blogspot.com/2008/04/girl-16-says-man-she-met-on.html] [http://www.txcn.com/sharedcontent/dws/txcn/houston/stories/khou070607_mh_vampirefreaks.255f6fff.html]. I massively edited the page to include only a brief history and things verified in those articles, everything else was opinion anyways. It is seemingly notable for these crimes, but I worry that this page will not stay this way for long.--CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 01:01, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep per CastAStone. The sources found proves that Vampirefreaks passes WP:WEB and WP:RS. [http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/2006/09/21/qc-vampirefreaksfundraiser.html This article] from Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and [http://books.google.com/books?id=__kDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA87&dq=%22Vampirefreaks%22 this magazine article] from Revolver are additional sources that prove this website's notability. Cunard (talk) 01:08, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep. Notable social networking website, and more widely used than its stub-like article suggests. Esteffect (talk) 02:34, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep. Notable, just needs expansion. -Falcon8765 (talk) 05:25, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 19:33, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.