Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vancouver Complication
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator and no delete votes. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki (π, ν) 15:43, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
=[[:Vancouver Complication]]=
:{{la|Vancouver Complication}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Vancouver Complication}})
No indication of passing WP:NALBUM. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:54, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:48, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:49, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:49, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep I was in Vancouver at the time and I was not previously aware of the compilation disc, but [https://www.allmusic.com/album/vancouver-complication-mw0000394450 AllMusic] has a review of it, local entertainment magazine [https://www.straight.com/article/vancouver-complication Georgia Straight] has a brief mention of it, [http://exclaim.ca/music/article/various_artists-vancouver_complication Exclaim] has a brief mention and Vancouver's second daily , [https://theprovince.com/entertainment/music/vancouver-complication The Province] mentions it in relation to an auction. I'd like to see more, but it appears that this is a notable recording related to Vancouver's punk scene, and Vancouver was the major centre of the genre in Canada. I suspect that there may be a few more sources in print as well. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:09, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - Walter Görlitz has found some useful sources and the fact that the compilation has been reissued attests to its importance. I have added the sources to the article, which had been completely unsourced for over ten years. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:26, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. This does need improvement, but this album was an extremely important milestone in the history of Canadian punk rock — on a ProQuest search, I get evidence of hits as late as 2013, including a massive spike in coverage in 2005 when it was reissued on CD, and it gets some attention in the book Have Not Been the Same as well (which is saying something, because that book isn't even primarily meant to cover the period when this album actually came out — but it still loomed large enough that it comes up anyway). I have to head out shortly for a prior engagement, so I can't tackle it right away, but I'll take a stab of my own at beefing up the article some more as well. Bearcat (talk) 22:37, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
::Update. I've now expanded the article and added some further sources above and beyond the ones that were already added by Walter Gorlitz. Bearcat (talk) 20:37, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep.Though the article needs improvement the recording has got notable sources according to the input from above editors and from the given sources and has also got enough publicity by print .Thus clearly satisfies WP:GNG.Vinodbasker (talk) 06:38, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I'm happy to close this out/withdraw the nomination. Seems to be an overwhelming support to keep. This was a close call for me. I know that Deletion is not cleanup, but initially felt that this really didn't warrant inclusion. The comments above have convinced me otherwise. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:36, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.