Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Show

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-admin closure) Till I Go Home (talk) 07:46, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

=[[Vanessa Show]]=

:{{la|Vanessa Show}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Vanessa Show}})

Article lacks sources to establish notability. Kelly hi! 16:10, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

  • Keep. Lack of sources in article is not a valid reason for deletion. Please see WP:BEFORE. Plenty of sources seem to be available on Google news. Perhaps a Spanish speaking editor could help determine which of these constitute substantial coverage: [http://www.eldia.com.ar/edis/20090914/20090914084410.htm][http://www.minutouno.com.ar/minutouno/nota/94380-conoce-la-gran-coleccion-de-plumas-devanessa-show/][http://ecodiario.eleconomista.es/internacional/noticias/715354/08/08/Argentina-Un-conocida-travesti-argentina-quiere-presentarse-como-candidata-a-diputada-por-el-oficialismo.html][http://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/suplementos/soy/1-418-2008-11-08.html][http://www.eldia.com.ar/edis/20080514/espectaculos9.htm][http://www.ciudad.com.ar/espectaculos/60618/los-mediaticos-no-se-rinden][http://www.diarioactualidad.com/noticias/21/41/articulo/35037/2010-07-09_pas-_que_te_vi_por_villegas_.html]. Pburka (talk) 20:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep, per Pburka. The links provided do constitute significant coverage as expected by the WP:GNG. The article needs some work to meet WP:NPOV, and some claims need to be removed unless properly sourced, but that's no reason for deletion — Frankie (talk) 21:17, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:28, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Strong Keep actress in question has plenty of coverage to make it notable and add more to it. Tinton5 (talk) 21:24, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.