Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vasyl Ko

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

=[[Vasyl Ko]]=

:{{la|Vasyl Ko}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Vasyl_Ko Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Vasyl Ko}})

No credible claim of significance/importance (see WP:A7). Also, not notable (fails WP:GNG; WP:NMUSIC@WP:MUSBIO). Article not referenced. WP:BEFORE done; no non-WP:SPS found. Ryk72 ^'c.s.n.s.' 02:40, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

delete No sources. Given he's Canadian found no English coverage whatsoever. LibStar (talk) 08:45, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Delete Clearly not notable, I can't find any reliable coverage at all about him. Actually can't find any coverage at all, in any type of source. FuriouslySerene (talk) 16:15, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Delete, created by an SPA, no sources, promotional. Mduvekot (talk) 18:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.