Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venetia, Lucretia and Eustacia Yewbeam

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Children of the Red King. Consensus is to not keep as a standalone article but the merge indicates a redirect as User:Gene93k suggests. Michig (talk) 07:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

=[[Venetia, Lucretia and Eustacia Yewbeam]]=

:{{la|Venetia, Lucretia and Eustacia Yewbeam}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Venetia,_Lucretia_and_Eustacia_Yewbeam Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Venetia, Lucretia and Eustacia Yewbeam}})

not notable enough for a separate article, have moved relevent info to main article Children of the Red King Coolabahapple (talk) 05:04, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:11, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:44, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:44, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Comment. Since content has been merged, the end action is to redirect, not delete. The redirect will preserve attribution history. • Gene93k (talk) 13:47, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. Certainly not notable enough for an article and an implausible redirect. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:43, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. Normally I'd suggest a redirect to Children of the Red King, but nobody on God's green earth is going to type "Venetia, Lucretia and Eustacia Yewbeam" as that exact phrase into the search field. Pax 06:44, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.