Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venita Kaul

:{{la|Venita Kaul}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Venita_Kaul Stats])

:({{Find sources|Venita Kaul}})

Going through WP:BEFORE, I found this subject is not even once the subject of substantial coverage to meet WP:GNG. Her work accomplishments do not approach WP:ANYBIO, and it's hard to tell exactly what would be her claim to notability. JFHJr (㊟) 16:18, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

• Speedy DeletePage made for the self promotion and publicity. Notability not observed. It should be deleted immediately.Jussychoulex (talk) 19:03, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - Wikipedia is not a ads issuer. Eduemoni^↑talk↓ 01:29, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

• Delete as above. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:40, 20 February 2013 (UTC).
• Delete Found nothing to suggest notability per WP:BIO. Some trivial quotations in the Gnews search, little more. Ray^Talk 04:25, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.