Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VentureNavigator

:{{la|VentureNavigator}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/VentureNavigator Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|VentureNavigator}})

Site is defunct and has been shut down for a while now. There is no redeeming historical value of this page being here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Misterpottery (talk • contribs) 11:25, August 6, 2016 (UTC)

• Comment - Discussion page was created without the {{tl|afd2}} template and never transcluded to a daily log. Fixed now--I offer no opinion on the nomination itself at this time. {{ping|Misterpottery}} If you wish to nominate other articles for deletion in the future, please fully follow the procedures at WP:AFDHOWTO. Thanks. --Finngall ^talk 14:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

• delete barring an influx of RSes - two links don't work and the third is a Telegraph promotion - and there's no reason to presume this went anywhere - David Gerard (talk) 15:20, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
• Delete no indications of notability, nor significant RS coverage. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:28, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.