Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vertigo Bliss

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:29, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

=[[Vertigo Bliss]]=

:{{la|Vertigo Bliss}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Vertigo_Bliss Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Vertigo Bliss}})

I came across this article as an A7, but the article asserts that the band has performed with notable persons/groups. That's enough to give a weak assertion of notability, enough to where A7 doesn't entirely fit. A search, however, doesn't show where this band would pass notability guidelines as a whole. I found some routine mentions of local performances, but not really anything about the group itself. Other than that, the only thing that they really received coverage for is a rock concert they launched the same year they created the band.

If anyone can find coverage then I'm willing to withdraw, but I just can't seem to really find good evidence of notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Delete. The only coverage I found was the news article on the charity concert already cited in the article. The article states that the band 'shared the stage' with some notable bands. 'Shared the stage' is a phrase that should be banned from Wikipedia as it generally just means someone played a support slot at a concert featuring someone more notable. --Michig (talk) 10:51, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Delete - Simply nothing to suggest better. SwisterTwister talk 20:07, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Delete - simply not enough in-depth coverage to show they meet notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:20, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.