Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vettaikaran (2nd nomination)

:{{la|Vettaikaran}} ([{{fullurl:Vettaikaran|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vettaikaran (2nd nomination)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Fails WP:NFF. The article was previously deleted for the same reason and to my knowledge there has been no additional development. Speedy G4 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vettaikaran&diff=259521375&oldid=259518305 was declined]. ^LeaveSleaves _talk 13:17, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

• Delete: Per nom. --OliverTwisted (Talk) 13:19, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
• Comment - the previously deleted version was entirely unreferenced, which's why I declined the G4. Regardless of the quality of the referencing (which I haven't evaluated), that has to be a substantial enough change to disqualify it. WilyD 14:36, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:57, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:58, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
• Comment - With a proper rewrite there may be enough for a stub, but I'm not sure how notable this is. --Bobak (talk) 19:03, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
• Weak delete without prejudice. Per the provided sources, talk about this probable film is starting to tweak the General Notability Guideline, but there's no harm in waiting a few weeks to bring it back once principle filming has begun. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:22, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
• Delete: notability not established. JamesBurns (talk) 08:13, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.