Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicky Nizri

:{{la|Vicky Nizri}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Vicky Nizri}})

Procedural nomination of a proposed deletion contested at requests for undeletion; nominator's rationale was "Notability not shown by reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, as required by WP:BIO, nor does it satisfy the requirements of WP:AUTHOR". Your thoughts? Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 03:29, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

-Delete- Not finding enough/any notability from secondary sources per the nomination. As a comment it is perhaps just too early to have an article on this person. Perhaps time will show more notability, but for now I am not seeing a reason (per policy) or a need for this article. It can always be rescued or created at a later date tyvm Pudge MclameO (talk) 04:01, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

• Delete - six years is more than enough time to find suitable references if they exist, and they do not. MSJapan (talk) 04:31, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
• Delete I was the PROD nominator and I stand by my original rationale.--Muhandes (talk) 12:06, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per lack of good sources on both Yahoo! and Google. SwisterTwister talk 06:38, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
• Delete not notableCurb Chain (talk) 07:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.