Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Vancier

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:16, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

=[[Victor Vancier]]=

:{{la|Victor Vancier}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Victor_Vancier Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Victor Vancier}})

Article fails to meet WP:BIO and WP:ANYBIO standards. A search turns up some secondary sources regarding the subject, mostly consisting of articles regarding his arrest and links to YouTube videos but no significant coverage from credible and independent sources. While his activities and imprisonment made the news, that alone doesn't seem enough to warrant an article. Furthermore, the Jewish Task Force appears to be solely an online based political organization of little to no significance. Having your own web site, a public access show in New York and making YouTube videos does not establish notability or relevance. The page also has a history of vandalism. NaturalistView (talk) 22:51, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 June 20. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:18, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep There is enough evidence to back up his notability. The history of vandalism, is in fact a history of whitewashing the article. To my opinion, this AfD is another attempt of whitewashing as this is only the second/third edit of a brand new editor. I even give a sockpuppet alert as the new editor seems well acquainted to the rules and policies, much more then you can expect from a new user. The Banner talk 08:44, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Speedy keep A convicted terrorist who easily passes WP:GNG. Article should probably be moved to Chaim Ben Pesach, the name by which (I think) he's better known, as opposed to his legal name. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 11:40, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 14:13, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 14:13, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 14:13, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 14:13, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep The ample reliable and verifiable sources about the subject passes the notability standard. The argument about vandalism is a good reason to protect the page, but a very poor reason to delete it. With an edit history of three edits, two of which are related to this AfD, it appears that we're dealing with an WP:SPA or an out-and-out sockpuppet. Alansohn (talk) 14:19, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep and support move to Chaim Ben Pesach per WP:COMMONNAME. Pburka (talk) 15:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep: Passes GNG. --Dcirovic (talk) 16:46, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.