Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikas Choudhary

:{{la|Vikas Choudhary}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Vikas_Choudhary Stats])

:({{Find sources|Vikas Choudhary}})

Non-notable person whose claims to have represented various cricket teams are not borne out in cricket databases Johnlp (talk) 21:15, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Johnlp (talk) 22:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

• Delete: Blatant hoax article, I'm amazed that the speedy was turned down: Google searches reveal absolutely nothing, and they definitely would if this was about a real Indian cricketer. Twitter account exists but is similarly a hoax. Note that the article's creator is repeatedly removing the deletion templates. Harrias ^talk 06:42, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

• Speedy delete: I'm amazed the speedy was turned down and the article deemed "not a blatant hoax"... it's about as obvious a hoax as I've seen in a long while! Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 18:13, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

• Delete: In addition to what other editors have said here, [http://tito-dutta.my3gb.com/IndianEnglishNewspapersSearch.html#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=Vikas%20Choudhary%20Delhi%20Cricket&gsc.sort= I can see only 1 or 2 mentions] (this direct link may not work in Internet Explorer) and it seems to be an autobiography as well, note the username "Imvchoudhary" Tito☸Dutta 01:20, 26 September 2013 (UTC) To clarify, the reason of my "delete" vote is "notability" Tito☸Dutta 01:21, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.