Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viktor Grebennikov

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) czar · · 05:18, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

=[[Viktor Grebennikov]]=

:{{la|Viktor Grebennikov}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Viktor_Grebennikov Stats])

:({{Find sources|Viktor Grebennikov}})

This individual is not even notable as a pseudo scientist (gluing dead insets to a board for anti-gravity!). This article has been here since 2006 and no one has been able to expand it to notability, or even add one WP:RS, at least for this English wiki. Aldebaran66 (talk) 04:48, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 05:34, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 05:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Weak keep. His ideas seem to be... unorthodox but Google books gives some reasonable sources. [http://books.google.com/books?id=HwOLGULAdX0C&pg=PA31&dq=%22Viktor+Grebennikov%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=utKlUcunFsHt0gWIpYBI&ved=0CEgQ6AEwBg] has a couple of pages about him and [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=QPir0eK0FdMC&q=%22Viktor+Grebennikov%22&dq=%22Viktor+Grebennikov%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=utKlUcunFsHt0gWIpYBI&redir_esc=y] at least mentions him (there might be more over the page but the gbooks preview doesn't show a lot); both of those are cranky but published by Random House. [http://books.google.com/books?id=rOggAQAAMAAJ&q=%22Viktor+Grebennikov%22&dq=%22Viktor+Grebennikov%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=utKlUcunFsHt0gWIpYBI&ved=0CFcQ6AEwCQ] seems to have at least a paragraph on him. Dricherby (talk) 10:23, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Keep NOTEable enough as a pseudo scientist as per Dricherby's links. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:46, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Comment I'm leaning towards keep, but if people doubt the sources are strong enough, a merge to Anti-gravity would be good, since that article contains an overview of many people's strange theories and Grebennikov would fit in there well. --Colapeninsula (talk) 18:55, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.