Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viktor Smolik

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:23, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Viktor Smolik]]=

:{{la|Viktor Smolik}} ([{{fullurl:Viktor Smolik|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viktor Smolik}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

No evidence of notability. The statement of the article "He is a significant figure in expressionism and cubism." is totally misleading as far as 1959 born painter could not be siginficant figure in artistic movement of early XX century. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 05:58, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete for notability; his fourth Google hit is today's deletion log. The obviously false claim about "expressionism and cubism" could easily be taken out right away. Hairhorn (talk) 13:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete non-notable.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 17:45, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Comment Smolik was deleted as non-notable today on [http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%8F:%D0%9A_%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8E/28_%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%8F_2009#.D0.92.D0.B8.D0.BA.D1.82.D0.BE.D1.80_.D0.A1.D0.BC.D0.BE.D0.BB.D0.B8.D0.BA ru.wikipedia.org]. No evidence of notability to be found in his articles on fr and es either. Enki H. (talk) 03:34, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom...Modernist (talk) 23:07, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.