Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vin1980

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:38, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

=[[Vin1980]]=

:{{la|Vin1980}} ([{{fullurl:Vin1980|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vin1980}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Delete as a neologism/hoax. The article stated that "Its usage is common in younger crowds" but a Google search turned up nothing. A G3 tag has been declined. Tavix | Talk 21:59, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 22:20, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Delete per nom. No reliable sources confirm the existence of "vin1980". — Malik Shabazz {{toolbar|separator=dot|talk | contribs }} 22:33, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I don't think it's a hoax; I take Kevin456 at his word that the term is used within the "Central Florida fetish community," but that doesn't establish notability. Call it a neologism. Cnilep (talk) 16:57, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete per WP:V, WP:N, WP:NEO. JohnCD (talk) 19:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete- pick one of the reasons from above and that's my reason. Yourname (talk) 03:07, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.