Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent Ganci

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 14:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

=[[Vincent Ganci]]=

:{{la|Vincent Ganci}} ([{{fullurl:Vincent Ganci|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent Ganci}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Contested prod. Non-notable mobster. Few ghits, even fewer that are relevant. Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:40, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Delete. Non-notable, non-referenced. Author's continual removal of PROD and AfD notices smacks of something going on. Dayewalker (talk) 07:10, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Comment. I fully agree with this assessment. The author admitted his intentions on the article's talk page. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete, google search gives almost nothing. Clear BLP problem in the article. --Soman (talk) 09:17, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Serious BLP issues. John Nevard (talk) 23:21, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Negative and and essentially unsourced biography. NYT "reference" mentions subject in passing and does not support anything in the article. • Gene93k (talk) 11:14, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

:*Note: I just removed unsourced content per WP:BLP and the rest is questionable too. Aside from the NYT link, all other sources found appear to be wiki-sourced, possibly circular-sourced. • Gene93k (talk) 11:43, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

::*And after removing that unsourced information, we are left with... an A7 speedy. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 22:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.