Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visi CAD/CAM

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Visi CAD/CAM}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visi CAD/CAM}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Visi CAD/CAM}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 14:11, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Visi CAD/CAM]]=

:{{la|1=Visi CAD/CAM}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Visi CAD/CAM}})

Article may not meet WP:GNG notability requirements. That requires multiple INDPENDENT sources (news outlets, for example) to discuss the product/company, and they must discuss it in some depth (a few paragraphs). The sources currently listed are from product's own website, or are minor technical documents, or from collaborating companies. Noleander (talk) 13:21, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Delete passing mentions in RS, but no WP:SIGCOV. Fortuna, Imperatrix Mundi 14:10, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:06, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.