Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vlad-Dan Perianu

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:26, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

=[[Vlad-Dan Perianu]]=

:{{la|Vlad-Dan Perianu}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Vlad-Dan_Perianu Stats])

:({{Find sources|Vlad-Dan Perianu}})

Absolutely no independent coverage suggests this individual may meet the criteria set out at WP:GNG, WP:BIO and WP:ARTIST. One (very) passing [http://www.zf.ro/ziarul-de-duminica/proiecte-in-miscare-vitralii-4014653/ mention] isn't enough.

And I know autobiographies are permitted, but I cannot fail to note that this article is the only contribution of its creator, called, of course, Perianu. Perhaps he should read WP:NOTLINKEDIN. - Biruitorul ^Talk 14:40, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Delete I was also unable to find any independent sources when I tagged for notability. I had hoped that the original contributor, having seen the tag, might be able to point us to some press he has received, but that does not appear to have happened. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:56, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:44, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Delete per WikiDan. No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 07:46, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.