Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voice of the River Valley

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus DGG ( talk ) 08:37, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

=[[:Voice of the River Valley]]=

:{{la|Voice of the River Valley}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Voice_of_the_River_Valley Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Voice of the River Valley}})

Fails WP:GNG and WP:COMPANY. Unable to find any secondary sources to support notability. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:24, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Delete - Appears to be spam by [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Tekhnecryst SPA]. 32.218.38.154 (talk) 02:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Delete as clear advertising, especially the fact the account was advertising-only but that the article literally says "The company services are....and the company now wants to say", there's nothing better beyond that hence delete. SwisterTwister talk 06:57, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete insufficient WP:GNG. Royal broil 07:53, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.