Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voiced velar tap (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Tap and flap consonants. Randykitty (talk) 22:44, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Voiced velar tap]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voiced velar tap}}

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Voiced velar tap}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Voiced velar tap}})

Was previously nominated by a sock, with incorrect reasoning, and therefore procedurally closed at once. Nevertheless, the article is neither adequately referenced, nor adequately referenceable, because it is based on a single idea of a recent PhD student in linguistics. It is Too Soon. Suggest merging? Elemimele (talk) 22:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

:Of the three references, one is a pdf of a conference proceeding, which means it wasn't peer reviewed; the second is a peer-reviewed piece of primary literature by the same authors as the first, and is referenced to the first, and the third is a preexisting encyclopaedia making a passing reference to a flapped allophone; I lack the expertise to know if this is adequate to support a complete article. I suspect this is WP:TOOSOON. Elemimele (talk) 22:34, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

::"one is a pdf of a conference proceeding, which means it wasn't peer reviewed" - Proceedings papers for ACAL are in fact peer reviewed. Stephen MUFC (talk) 10:22, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.