Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Von Lahmm

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:10, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

=[[Von Lahmm]]=

:{{la|Von Lahmm}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Von Lahmm}})

Unsourced and of dubious notability if correct. Zero sources provided, no reliable sources found. Only wikilinkable targets are geographical articles. Prod removed without comment. Family member articles are part of the walled garden. The have been tagged for speedy deletion as unremarkable. (Created by a new SPA, subarticles (family members) created and recreated by the SPA, a blocked sock and a newly suspected sock. Seems to be one editor who feels their family tree should be on Wikipedia.) SummerPhD (talk) 14:01, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Support: Unsourced and of dubious notability if correct.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 17:46, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Delete per nom. There's nothing we can base a policy-based article on. No such user (talk) 18:11, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Delete there is no any source --Јованвб (talk) 16:36, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Delete. No sources. Does not appear to be notable. Google search only turns up Wikipedia and mirror sites.--EdwardZhao (talk) 16:33, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.