Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voodoo Trombone Quartet

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

=[[Voodoo Trombone Quartet]]=

:{{la|Voodoo Trombone Quartet}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Voodoo_Trombone_Quartet Stats])

Seemingly NN musical group. Fails all 10 criteria of WP:MUSIC with the possible exception of #10 - being included in a limited version of a video game - which is not usually enough by itself. Signed with a WP:NN record label doesn't help the case. Toddst1 (talk) 18:15, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 ^(Talk) 04:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 ^(Talk) 04:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 15:58, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Rare indeed is the AFD discussion where I can listen to the album whilst participating. However, that doesn't help to verify this article. There's nothing on the sleeve notes. There's nothing even on the subject's own WWW site. No-one else documents this group, either. I have found no way to verify anything bar 1 statement in this article, which is the name of 1 of its members, and an album title and record label, which the article at hand claims not to be the case. The only other thing that I found was a review saying that that member put fictional information on the WWW about the group. It did not actually provide any facts itself. I'm rewinding to track #6, and this subject is not documented in any in-depth independent reliable sources. Uncle G (talk) 22:46, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete as I have found nothing better at all and there's nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister talk 07:34, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.