Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vortis (Doctor Who)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, with no preference/prejudice as to whether this should be merged or where. Merging is a non-AfD procedure that can be done with discussion on relevant talkpages of the articles. Doesn't seem to be a consensus as to where to merge, but there is certainly a consensus to not delete this. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 15:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

=[[Vortis (Doctor Who)]]=

:{{la|Vortis (Doctor Who)}} ([{{fullurl:Vortis (Doctor Who)|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vortis (Doctor Who)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable planet- only appeared in one episode and a novel. We don't have articles on every planet to have ever appeared in Doctor Who. --OZ OO 21:48, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Merge to Doctor Who. Not enough for it's own article, but it could be helpful for the other article. Undeath (talk) 22:02, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Merge to List of Doctor Who planets and The Web Planet. We shouldn't have an AfD over it. — Edokter • Talk • 22:14, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Merge into The Web Planet and List of Doctor Who planets Will ^(talk) 22:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Merge, although I think most of this info is already in the two articles. --Brian Olsen (talk) 01:38, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Merge as needed per the above. --Umrguy42 (talk) 19:04, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep per our first pillar, as the article is consistent with a specialized encyclopedia on Doctor Who, of which there are many: [http://www.amazon.com/Doctor-Who-Encyclopedia-BBC-Hardcover/dp/1846072913/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1205463070&sr=1-1 Doctor Who Encyclopedia] (Doctor Who (BBC Hardcover)) (Hardcover) by Gary Russell, [http://www.amazon.com/Doctor-Who-Completely-Unofficial-Encyclopedia/dp/097259597X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1205463070&sr=1-3 Doctor Who: The Completely Unofficial Encyclopedia] by Chris Howarth and Steve Lyons, [http://www.amazon.com/Doctor-Who-Encyclopedia-Baker-Years/dp/B000P0TSZ8/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1205463070&sr=1-4 The Doctor Who Encyclopedia: The Baker Years] (Paperback) by John Peel and Hal Schuster etc., even ones devoted entirely to the planets, i.e. [http://www.amazon.com/Encyclopedia-Worlds-Doctor-Who-E-K/dp/0340511060/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1205463070&sr=1-5 Encyclopedia of the Worlds of Doctor Who: E-K] (Paperback) by David Saunders. So the subject is unquestionably encyclopedic and it looks like reliable references could exist, too. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 02:56, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep: a good, encyclopedic article on a subject which is notable as the only Doctor Who planet to feature entirely non humanoid characters. As pointed out in the post above, reliable, independent sources exist. Pawnkingthree (talk) 14:57, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.