Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WAVE Trust (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. appears to meet GNG 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:13, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

=[[:WAVE Trust]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WAVE Trust}}

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=WAVE Trust}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=WAVE Trust}})

Kept a decade ago at ANI, but a BEFORE shows no coverage that would meet our current standards of notability for organizations. It exists, and has some political support, but does not appear notable. Star Mississippi 20:45, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 20:45, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 20:45, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

  • Courtesy {{ping|Obsidian_Soul|John of Reading}} as still-active editors from prior AfD. Star Mississippi 20:47, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

:*{{ping|Star Mississippi}}, I do not remember editing this article. Was this an AfC? I do not appear in the history either. Unless I was in the ANI discussion, in which case, it's too long ago for me to remember what it was about and I'll have to recuse. I don't participate much in internal discussions these days.-- OBSIDIANSOUL 03:54, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

  • No worries, {{ping|Obsidian Soul}}. You'd !voted Keep in the AfD and I wanted to notify all editors from that discussion who were still active in case anyone wanted to weigh in. No need to participate though. Star Mississippi 13:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:50, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep, in addition to the sources uncovered in the previous AfD, there is a speech about the WAVE Trust by Iain Duncan Smith (the then Secretary of State for Work and Pensions) on the UK government website.[https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/wave-trust-early-intervention] SailingInABathTub (talk) 22:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep. Passes WP:GNG. Other quality independent sources from google books: [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Community_Public_Health_in_Policy_and_Pr/OGjxDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0], [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Neuroparenting/QcYcDQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22WAVE+Trust%22+1996&pg=PA69&printsec=frontcover], [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Community_Public_Health_in_Policy_and_Pr/d_dwbQhmPboC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22WAVE+Trust%22+1996&pg=PT282&printsec=frontcover], [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Psychological_Governance_and_Public_Poli/IkUlDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22WAVE+Trust%22&pg=PA107&printsec=frontcover], [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Health_and_Inequality/fAZgAwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22WAVE+Trust%22&pg=PA38&printsec=frontcover], [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Policing_Scotland/gIHvq96OeLIC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22WAVE+Trust%22+charity&pg=PA408&printsec=frontcover], [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Challenging_the_Politics_of_Early_Interv/BBgwDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22WAVE+Trust%22+charity&pg=PA90&printsec=frontcover] Best.4meter4 (talk) 01:51, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.