Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WBlite

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Spam, the way it is written Tone 20:33, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[WBlite]]=

:{{la|WBlite}} ([{{fullurl:WBlite|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WBlite}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Believe that the lack of available resources and sources on software makes this nothing but spam and should be speedy deleted. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 18:45, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete advertorial spam. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
  • This article was AfD'd while it was already prodded. I have removed the prod tag; prod rationale, added by {{user|Dank}}, was:

:A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links: [http://www.google.com/search?&as_eq=wikipedia&as_epq={{urlencode:{{SUBPAGENAME}}}} {{SUBPAGENAME}}] – [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-press+-release&as_epq={{urlencode:{{SUBPAGENAME}}}} news], [http://books.google.com/books?&as_brr=0&as_epq={{urlencode:{{SUBPAGENAME}}}} books], [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_epq={{urlencode:{{SUBPAGENAME}}}} scholar] Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability. KuyaBriBriTalk 19:16, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.