Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WFCA Plc
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:26, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
=[[WFCA Plc]]=
:{{la|WFCA Plc}} – (
:({{Find sources|WFCA Plc}})
Clients are notable, company isn't. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:50, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 15:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Per WP:CORPDEPTH, while the company is mentioned in online trade publications, the mentions are all incidental. Other references are simply press releases or announcements of awards. I couldn't find any mention in regional or national news at all. I don't think it meets the criteria for WP:COMPANY. MikeMan67 (talk) 09:20, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in independent third-party sources. If such sources are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.