Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WMIX Software

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 08:29, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

=[[WMIX Software]]=

:{{la|WMIX Software}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/WMIX_Software Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|WMIX Software}})

no reliable secondary sources, no indication of notability. All references, except the Alexa page rank are primary sources. Page created by an editor with a serious COI who contested the proposed deletion without explanation. Other products from this company are currently being discussed in a number of AfDs: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goverlan Remote Control Software, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PJ Technologies and WP:Articles for deletion/Goverlan VNC Viewer. Lemnaminor (talk) 09:26, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete. I was the one who placed the proposed deletion tag on this promotional article, which was sourced only to Alexa for page rank and press releases for everything else. Without third party sourcing, this cannot meet the notability guidelines. - MrOllie (talk) 13:54, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete- software article of unclear notability, lacking independent RS references. A search turned up nothing except for this [http://windowsitpro.com/scripting/remote-administration-software-puts-gui-face-wmis-functionality Windows IT Pro] article, which reads like a press release and in any case is not sufficient on its own to establish notability.Dialectric (talk) 16:02, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.