Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wapping-gate.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per A1. No context; page served only as a portal for an external link. RunningOnBrains^{(talk page)} 18:15, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Wapping-gate.]]=

:{{la|Wapping-gate.}} ([{{fullurl:Wapping-gate.|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wapping-gate.}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Is just a link to a news article. Perhaps the topic deserves a full article, but right now it appears to be a link to a news article and the headline, failing WP:Advert. Any modification would be hard-pressed to beat WP:News articles. Gosox5555 (talk) 15:32, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Delete. It doesn't even matter whether the investigation itself is notable or not: the term "Wapping-gate" is an obvious neologism[http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Wapping-gate] that falls under WP:NEO. The cited Guardian article doesn't even use it. — Rankiri (talk) 16:11, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 16:50, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Speedy Delete:Per WP:A1--Gordonrox24' | Talk'' 17:52, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.