Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/War on Terra
=[[War on Terra]]=
:{{la|War on Terra}} – (
:({{Find sources|War on Terra}})
Don't get me wrong. I love the punny segment titles The Daily Show comes up with. But this one from 2005 passes WP:N just because the BBC had a short series by the same name? Or is it because of the band, which according to [http://www.myspace.com/waronterraband their Myspace] last logged in over a year ago and has no shows scheduled? (Its inclusion is WP:PROMOTION anyway.) The article suffers from multiple issues, and we should put it out of its misery. It also seems that Uncyclopedia had it first, which is never a good sign. The first sentence even admits it's a catchphrase! --BDD (talk) 20:28, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete There's really nothing notable about a self-admitted catchphrase. Ducknish (talk) 22:28, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete because WP:IS NOT A COLLECTION OF GOOGLE SEARCH RESULTS. Oh, and per nom. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 02:53, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Does not meet WP:GNG.--JayJasper (talk) 20:41, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Merge. If it's a catchphrase from The Daily Show, we should merge it into the show's Article. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 08:21, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.