Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wave of the Music
=[[Wave of the Music]]=
:{{la|Wave of the Music}} ([{{fullurl:Wave of the Music|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wave of the Music}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
Unsourced, crystal-ballism. Spellcast (talk) 17:37, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, pending sourcing (which shouldn't be difficult). There is no reason we shouldn't have articles about confirmed forthcoming albums by important artists. Jdcooper (talk) 17:52, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
:See WP:V. Without refs, we don't know how valid this info is. Even if there were refs, it'll be too crystal-bally at this stage. Spellcast (talk) 06:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Needs sourcing. If not sourced during this AfD then delete. SilkTork *YES! 00:32, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - per WP:CRYSTAL - eo (talk) 20:22, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing in the article demonstrates that it's a "confirmed forthcoming album" - i.e., no references. Delete under crystal ball principle and for failing to meet the verifiability guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 21:21, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.