Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayne Crookes

=[[Wayne Crookes]]=

:{{la|Wayne Crookes}} ([{{fullurl:Wayne Crookes|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayne Crookes}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

This does not appear to meet our notability criteria for living subjects. I also fear it may give the impression that we're being a little pointy. Considering the asserted notability regards him suing Wikimedia, among others, for defamation posted about him on the internet, perhaps not the best idea to keep a biography on him, which leaves him open for more defamatory comments. لennavecia 00:20, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete - non notable, major BLP concerns, and completely inappropriate in any form. A check of websites and news databases provides nothing of value. Ottava Rima (talk) 00:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete: Not noteworthy enough for inclusion. --MZMcBride (talk) 00:50, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete The lawsuits do not make him notable, even if a few news sources wrote about it. Then any of his court cases turn out to be important, then we can have an article about that. --Apoc2400 (talk) 07:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete - reeks of a personal vendetta by an IP address editor. Eric Barbour (talk) 07:58, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:56, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.