Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wazmo Nariz

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 03:45, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

=[[Wazmo Nariz]]=

:{{la|Wazmo Nariz}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wazmo_Nariz Stats])

:({{Find sources|Wazmo Nariz}})

Non-notable musician, uncited page and no relevant sources could be discovered. felt_friend 01:10, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Keep I am seeing moderate coverage around 1980 in publications like the Los Angeles Times, the Dallas Morning News, the Chicago Tribune and Billboard. Clearly not a major act, but they had a couple of two bit hits, enough for an encyclopedia article. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:23, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep. Enough coverage found in GNews/GBooks to establish notability. --Michig (talk) 13:30, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete Not notable Ldvnsx (talk) 16:06, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Keep per significant coverage in sources listed above. —Theopolisme (talk) 00:14, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.