Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We Are the Bible
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Anathema. Overall consensus is to redirect (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 00:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
=[[We Are the Bible]]=
:{{la|We Are the Bible}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|We Are the Bible}})
Non-notable song which doesn't appear to have charted Emotionalllama (talk) 22:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to Anathema Song hasn't charted, so fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. I guess redirecting to the band name makes sense, since it's a plausible search term. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to the album title; the song has not charted significantly, and has not received substantive coverage in any reliable sources. Still a valid search term, so redirect rather than delete. Vanamonde93 (talk) 22:39, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 23:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 23:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 23:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect - fails NSONGS. Please note it should redirect specifically to Anathema (band). Sergecross73 msg me 01:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
:*Agree about redirecting to Anathema (band). Joseph2302 (talk) 07:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.