Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wealth-X

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Wealth-X}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wealth-X Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Wealth-X}})

Fails WP:NCORP.

class=wikitable
Source || Significant? || Independent? || Reliable? || Secondary? || Pass/Fail || Notes
[http://fortune.com/2014/12/11/wealth-x/ fortune.com]	{{aye}}	{{nay}}	{{aye}}	{{aye}}	{{nay}}	It reads like advertorial to me.
[https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=140988885 bloomberg.com]	{{nay}}	-	{{aye}}	-	{{nay}}	Trade listing
[https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/19/your-money/who-are-the-richest-of-the-rich.html NYT]	{{nay}}	{{nay}}	{{aye}}	-	{{nay}}	A few passing mentions which make it clear that the article is based on Wealth-X's research. Not about Wealth-X.
[https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/cities-worlds-richest-people-wealth-london-new-york-paris-hong-kong-singapore-los-angeles-a8099221.html independent.co.uk]	{{nay}}	{{nay}}	{{aye}}	-	{{nay}}	Reprint from [https://www.businessinsider.com/richest-people-real-estate-vacation-home-2017-12?r=UK#17-munich-1 businessinsider.com], taken from Wealth-X's research. Not about Wealth-X.
[https://www.insightpartners.com/companies/wealth-x/ insightpartners.com]	-	{{nay}}	{{nay}}	-	{{nay}}	Published by parent company - primary source
[https://www.wsj.com/articles/hollywoods-first-great-art-collector-1437077680 WSJ] [http://archive.is/ayiH1 archive.is]	{{nay}}	{{aye}}	{{aye}}	-	{{nay}}	Wealth-X gets a passing mention as the source for one fact. Taken from Wealth-X's research. Not about Wealth-X.
[https://www.wealthx.com/about-us/press-news/company-news/2016/wealth-x-reveals-the-worlds-50-wealthiest-people/ wealthx.com]	-	{{nay}}	{{nay}}	-	{{nay}}	Company's own website - primary source
[http://time.com/money/4194163/bill-gates-richest-person-on-earth-2016/ time.com]	{{nay}}	{{nay}}	{{aye}}	-	{{nay}}	Redirects to [http://money.com/money/4194163/bill-gates-richest-person-on-earth-2016/ money.com], reprint from [https://www.businessinsider.com/50-richest-people-on-earth-2016-1?r=US&IR=T businessinsider.com], taken from Wealth-X's research. Not about Wealth-X.
colspan=5| Total qualifying sources || 0 || There must be multiple qualifying sources to meet the notability requirements

-- Cabayi (talk) 13:41, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 13:43, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:15, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:15, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:15, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

::Note: When I archived the WSJ article at archive.is (so I could read it) the discussion at Talk:Madonna (entertainer)/Archive 21#Madonna's net worth was shown as linking to the same source. Pinging the users from that discussion: {{u|IndianBio}}, {{u|SNUGGUMS}}, {{u|SmokeyJoe}}, {{u|Chrishonduras}}, {{u|Moxy}}, {{u|Petergriffin9901}} & {{u|Akhiljaxxn}}. Cabayi (talk) 14:27, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

::And the article's contributors... {{u|Allenkong11}}, {{u|Emir of Wikipedia}}, {{u|Mwp42881}}, {{u|BD2412}}, {{u|Dl2000}} and {{u|TAnthony}}. Cabayi (talk) 14:33, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

• I have only edited this article to fix a disambiguation link, and have no opinion on its propriety. bd2412 T 16:42, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
• Comment if this publication itself is reliable for money numbers, then I don't see any good reason to not mark its own site as such (presuming we only use the site for non-contentious claims on itself where there's no reasonable doubt of authenticity). I don't have any comment regarding publication notability. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:55, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.