Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wedlock discography

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SPEEDY DELETED by User:Yunshui per WP:CSD#A9, following the deletion of the band's article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wedlock (band) (2nd nomination). postdlf (talk) 16:07, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

=[[Wedlock discography]]=

:{{la|Wedlock discography}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wedlock_discography Stats])

:({{Find sources|Wedlock discography}})

WP:GNG - Not notable
WP:Promo/WP:Sock - Article has been almost entirely edited/maintained by sockpuppets [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Vorspire] PeterWesco (talk) 00:40, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:20, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:20, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:20, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

WP:WalledGarden - Of sockpuppet created, maintained, and endorsed articles. PeterWesco (talk) 00:41, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
[Delete] - Definitely a walled garden. Recommend consolidating Exogamy (album), Black Sundress, Continuity (album), Paul Allgood, and Wedlock discography into one AfD. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:33, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

AFD for band article here. If the band is deleted as not notable, I see no basis for listing their albums. Best practice to follow in the future would be to have listed this along with the band's article in one AFD, or to at least link to that AFD given that this is largely dependent on it, instead of making readers track it down on their own. postdlf (talk) 03:14, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.