Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendy Sue Johnson

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. czar ⨹ 04:20, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

=[[Wendy Sue Johnson]]=

:{{la|Wendy Sue Johnson}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wendy_Sue_Johnson Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Wendy Sue Johnson}})

WP:BLP of a politician notable only as a representative on a local school board. This is not a claim of notability that passes WP:NPOL — the lowest level of office that entitles a person to an article is the state legislature — and the referencing here is extremely reliant on primary and user-generated sources, so WP:GNG isn't passed either. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 10:22, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Weak Delete - Is Bearcat railing against local officials again? Ah well.... This AfD looks right at least. I'm failing to see any direct coverage of this woman in RS. She does have lots of mentions in the [https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&es_th=1&ie=UTF-8#q=%22Wendy+Sue+Johnson%22+site:leadertelegram.com&tbm=nws&start=0 local rag] though.... NickCT (talk) 15:54, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:07, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:07, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:07, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:07, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 04:24, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Delete The local paper covers the school board well, but there is no indication that the subject meets the WP:GNG. – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 23:40, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 23:42, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.