Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Australian Ballet

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 20:24, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

=[[West Australian Ballet]]=

:{{la|West Australian Ballet}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/West_Australian_Ballet Stats])

:({{Find sources|West Australian Ballet}})

A possible candidate for saving, there may be reliable sources to establish this company's notability. So far, however, they are not in the article, nor could I quickly find any. As this stands, the article fails Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). PS. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Cavallari for a related AFD. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:59, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

:Keep Most 60 year old state ballet companies are notable. Not everything is on google. Some of [http://au.news.search.yahoo.com/search?sort=date&p=ballet+west+australian&fr=thewest these] refs would prove notability. The-Pope (talk) 14:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

:Keep Sixty years is notable for a large-scale arts organization by itself. — Robert Greer (talk) 01:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

:Keep [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=C_Ve0H7Q3lUC&pg=PA171 This] is quite a substantial account of the company's early years, and [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=geO6K-1M114C&pg=PA296 this], while far shorter, also contributes to notability. For more recent periods, newspapers seem to give quite a bit of coverage, though it may be rather time-consuming to evaluate it properly - for instance, a review of one of the company's performances can be substantially about the company even if it name-checks the company only once. PWilkinson (talk) 16:36, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.