Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wheels Entertainments

:{{la|Wheels Entertainments}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wheels_Entertainments Stats])

:({{Find sources|Wheels Entertainments}})

Non-notable company. Half the sources are primary sources, another quarter or so doesn't mention the company at all, the rest mentions it in passing and does not even agree on the company name's spelling. No significant coverage at all. Heavy doses of synthesis and WP:COATRACK. Huon (talk) 11:07, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

• Comment. This business apparently operates ferris wheels in the UK. We have articles on some of the wheels at issue, like Wheel of Manchester and Yorkshire Wheel. We also have an article on the business that used to operate them, Great City Attractions, which apparently went bankrupt last year. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:51, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
• Weak keep -- I am troubled by the synthesis aspects of the article and the references to things being "reported" to be the case. This is getting rather too close to WP:OR for comfort. Nevertheless, I am of the view that the article can be rescued. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:36, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
• Keep. I put this article together at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wheels Entertainments. It was assessed and created without any issues being raised or improvements being requested. I believe it is comprehensively sourced and that there are no synthesis issues. I have addressed the issue of the spelling of the company name. I have asked for help at User talk:Peterkingiron#Wheels Entertainments and intend to further improve the article to address my use of "...it was reported..." which seems to have created an unfavourable impression, despite the valid references. If there are any other issues, I would appreciate the opportunity to address them. 92.40.185.27 (talk) 12:55, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.