Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whilly Bermudez Media

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Discussion centered around WP:GNG, with most participants feeling that the sources provided were press releases and therefore not independent; thus, notability under WP:GNG was not established. j⚛e decker ^talk 21:59, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

=[[Whilly Bermudez Media]]=

:{{la|Whilly Bermudez Media}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Whilly_Bermudez_Media Stats])

:({{Find sources|Whilly Bermudez Media}})

No evidence of notability. One reference is a press release, the other three about the owner, not the company. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:52, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Keep and rename to Whilly Bermudez - a quick news search [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Whilly+Bermudez%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1#hl=en&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Whilly+Bermudez%22&oq=%22Whilly+Bermudez%22&gs_l=serp.3...5381.5667.0.6374.2.2.0.0.0.0.39.68.2.2.0...0.0...1c.1.EKeVd9lH4vI&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&fp=c13273be6eabcdf6&biw=1280&bih=963 here] suggests that's the term the reliable sources are talking about. --Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:11, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:00, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:00, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 11:22, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ΛΧΣ21™ 19:48, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Delete - Although Ritchie's news results provided a hefty amount, a large portion of them are simply press releases. One of them mentioned that he ran for Miami-Dade County Commission in 2008 but I haven't found any evidence confirming that he won. This article's miaminewtimes.com reference (second reference) mentions that he also ran for the Florida House of Representatives 116th district in 2009 but I also haven't found any evidence suggesting that he won. These two candidacies may suggest notability but it would be a stub at most. A Google News search for "Whilly Bermudez Group" (it appears to be the accurate name) [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&q=Whilly+Bermudez+Media&oq=Whilly+Bermudez+Media&gs_l=news-cc.3..43j43i400.626.1719.0.1969.2.2.0.0.0.0.305.341.1j3-1.2.0...0.0...1ac.1.hcKMR8594RM#hl=en&gl=us&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&q=Whilly+Bermudez+Group&oq=Whilly+Bermudez+Group&gs_l=serp.3...23973.24594.0.24960.5.5.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0...0.0...1c.1.ouiIJwQzyj4&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=4c25bddd8415723a&bpcl=35243188&biw=1430&bih=706 provided] mostly press releases and one mention through a Spanish-language news article that also contains personal details about Whilly Bermudez so this suggests that the company itself is not notable. Bermudez is also a board member of the Institute for Child & Family Health but that wouldn't support an appropriate article. The only true significance would be the two candidacies but, as mentioned, that would be it. SwisterTwister talk 21:34, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Delete The media company appears to have no independent coverage at all. All references cited in the article are press releases. The person, Whilly Bermudez, is somewhat better known (described [http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=MH&s_site=miami&p_multi=MH&p_theme=realcities&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=11DE1EA5A3F01E78&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM here] as an "event marketer"}, but two unsuccessful runs for office do not meet WP:POLITICIAN, and any personal coverage he received was simply about his campaigns.[http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&q=%22Whilly+Bermudez%22&oq=%22Whilly+Bermudez%22&gs_l=news-cc.3..43j43i400.1773.8659.0.11354.29.12.3.10.0.0.441.954.0j4j4-1.5.0...0.0...1ac.1.RqxPT_qs_Ns#hl=en&gl=us&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Whilly+Bermudez%22&oq=%22Whilly+Bermudez%22&gs_l=serp.3...69419.70244.1.71039.6.6.0.0.0.4.276.1356.0j2j4.6.0...0.0...1c.1.Dn2v2XfIxCs&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=ff1e2912dce567eb&bpcl=35466521&biw=980&bih=678] --MelanieN (talk) 00:04, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Delete: A search turns up only press releases, which are not WP:RS. Fails WP:GNG on not enough coverage in independent reliable sources. --Batard0 (talk) 10:02, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Delete - for lack of independent coverage Fireflo (talk) 09:43, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.