Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whispering to Witches

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles 00:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

=[[Whispering to Witches]]=

:{{la|Whispering to Witches}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Whispering to Witches}})

Non notable book by non notable author. No awards, no references, no statistics - no nothing. Myosotis Scorpioides 21:09, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Weak Keep - The BBC has covered it [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3562670.stm here]. Google News also shows some reviews behind pay walls. The bulk of the article looks like a copy-paste of a book review especially with the recommendation at the end. That will need some serious copyediting. -- Whpq (talk) 17:55, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Keep I added several references. The book has been reviewed by the BBC, reprinted multiple times, and distributed in at least 12 countries [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4636971.stm]. You were right, Whpq, the bulk of the article was a cut-and-paste from the book's front flap; I deleted it. It's now a stub - but a referenced, notable stub. --MelanieN (talk) 02:07, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Keep, it needs expansion and plot, but it's notable. Glimmer721 ^talk 23:47, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.