Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitechapel (Musical)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 05:00, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[Whitechapel (Musical)]]=

:{{la|Whitechapel (Musical)}} ([{{fullurl:Whitechapel (Musical)|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitechapel (Musical)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Delete as WP:CRYSTAL and complete lack of statements regarding notability (would be a speedy candidate if musicals could be speedied). -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • [http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/count/index.php?name={{urlencode:Lilac Soul}}&wiki=wikipedia&lang=en count])} 18:42, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete, in complete agreement with Lilac Soul. I took the liberty of cleaning up the article, since I did not want those unreferenced adjectives to stay on WP for another week. Drmies (talk) 19:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
~~Delete~~Keep without prejudice for recreation. I actually do know about this musical. Unfortunately this reads like spam, and WP:COI given {{User|Leviathan90}} contrib history. I want a good article on this since what I heard (not from a WP:RS) sounds great. jbolden1517 ^Talk 06:06, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

:* {{User|Drmies}} has fixed the spam problem and sourced, with this version I'd say a Keep jbolden1517 ^Talk 14:49, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:03, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete If I read the source right it is a production by an educational institution. Last time I checked those were not notable, especially when they haven't yet gathered press attention. I'm also hesitent about it because George Lusk wasn't a police officer of any kind. Either the play was based on misinformation or it spreads misinformation. If the article happens to remain it should explain how the Lusk in the play suddenly became part of the police force. - Mgm|^(talk) 21:50, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete - there are no reliable sources covering this musical. -- Whpq (talk) 16:45, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.