Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitehouse Institute of Design

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:UNIGUIDE. (non-admin closure). –Davey2010 • (talk) 01:41, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

=[[Whitehouse Institute of Design]]=

:{{la|Whitehouse Institute of Design}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Whitehouse_Institute_of_Design Stats])

:({{Find sources|Whitehouse Institute of Design}})

Fails WP:N per WP:SPIP and the principles of WP:ONEEVENT. This school is only of interest because of a controversy surrounding the Australian Prime Minister's daughter. Surturz (talk) 03:43, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep. The article has existed since 2012, and the controversy around the PM's daughter's scholarship only arose in 2014, so both policies you've cited don't apply. It's a notable private provider, would have sailed through WP:GNG before this incident, and is the sort of institution I'd expect Wikipedia to have an article on. The Drover's Wife (talk) 05:16, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep per :WP:UNIGUIDE as a degree-giving institution with a page link (ref 1) from the Universities Admissions Centre site. AllyD (talk) 05:35, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep. Degree-granting institution, kept by long-standing precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

  • keep degree awarding institutions have inherent notability. Even when you disregard the controversy over Abbott's daughter. LibStar (talk) 11:50, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep - meets inclusion criteria. Agree there is more interest of late but this article existing long before that "controversy" did. St★lwart111 13:11, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Proposer comment - I was unaware of a general consensus that degree-awarding institutions satisfy WP:N. Happy for a WP:SNOW keep. --Surturz (talk) 00:31, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

: can you please withdraw your nomination then, thanks. LibStar (talk) 01:24, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.