Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiclear

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. X clamation point 00:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[Wiclear]]=

:{{la|Wiclear}} ([{{fullurl:Wiclear|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiclear}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Wiki software with no particular claim to notability or uniqueness other than existing; user base seems low and project seems to be halted since 2007. §FreeRangeFrog 16:47, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 17:20, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete Non-notable software, no valid sources. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 18:56, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Grumpy Delete There's a difference between being unsourced and being unsourcable. Here are sources: [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1367497.1367581], [http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/4166], which mention the article. But I still do not think this software is anywhere near notable. Cazort (talk) 22:10, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

::Neither of those sources are third-party, non trivial sources anyway. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 14:34, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete argue amongst yourselves :-) but the source is weak in this one Chzz ► 16:54, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.