Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wigger slam

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Let me suggest that listing a blog entry titled "Wikiipedia fascists deleted my article" as the first reference probably isn't the way to win friends and influence people here. OTOH, the complaint there of the article being tagged and deleted within minutes of creation is unfortunately all too familiar. Glad we did this one (and the preceding prod) the right way. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 13:20, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Wigger slam]]=

:{{la|Wigger slam}} ([{{fullurl:Wigger slam|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wigger slam}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable musical genre. The references provided don't appear to be reliable ones. A different version of this article (located here) was prodded and deleted in August 2008. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:52, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Delete as non-notable neologism; no cites are given from reliable sources to back this up, almost all Google hits for the term are about the controversy over the article. -- The Anome (talk) 11:58, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. WP:NEO Niteshift36 (talk) 06:13, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.