Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willem van IJperen

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SW— confer 23:03, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

=[[Willem van IJperen]]=

:{{la|Willem van IJperen}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Willem van IJperen}})

BLP1E. Medical ethicist, available sourcing appears to revolve around a license suspension on child protection issues, a case in which he was reinstated. One possible counterargument might be that the "Fellow of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health" is sufficient to keep. --joe deckertalk to me 18:06, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete There are a fair number of articles at [http://www.google.com/webhp#hl=en&sugexp=frgbld&gs_nf=1&qe=d2lsbGVtIHZhbiBpanBlcmVu&qesig=bis71qHoO3iHd2aMjnp9tA&pkc=AFgZ2tmHuRhtzynG--aQ_nrYt7uJxXbMt1A-Awshq1v8whmFWN_zJDtJCeW7UBdd7yAeofO-f1TQOMDcPK3t5xo5zpEHXuIBRg&ds=n&pq=william%20van%20ijperen&cp=5&gs_id=2g&xhr=t&q=willem+van+ijperen&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&oq=willem+van+ijperen&aq=&aqi=&aql=&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=1d6fc3adc6e3eaf8&biw=1058&bih=664 Google News], but they are all about that one incident, a clear case of WP:BLP1E. Google Scholar finds nothing so he does not qualify under WP:ACADEMIC. "Fellow of the Royal College" does not appear to be a big deal, it simply means that he is a certified specialist; there are more than 13,000 such Fellows.[http://www.rcpch.ac.uk/member-services/categories-membership/categories-membership] --MelanieN (talk) 22:49, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete - Appears to be known only for this single event which not so widely reported as to reach notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:28, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.