Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Gordon Carder
=[[William Gordon Carder]]=
:{{la|William Gordon Carder}} – (
:({{findsources|William Gordon Carder}})
See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice M. Findlay, for an article by the same creator, written in the same vein, with the same problems. Here also there is not even a hint of the person passing WP:PROF or WP:N, with the same obfuscation--for instance, in the further reading section, the suggestion that the book by Terrence Craig will contain lots of useful information about Carder. What do we find? A self-published book of Carder's is [http://books.google.com/books?id=eV90cMpt8xYC&q=carder#v=snippet&q=carder&f=false listed in the bibliography]. Drmies (talk) 20:51, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of notability presented in the article, and a Google search fails to uncover anything of substance. StAnselm (talk) 01:16, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per above (GregJackP (talk) 02:43, 22 February 2010 (UTC))
- Keep as per contribution to the Indian Church which is not being recognised by other racists.--Pradeep (talk) 16:47, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:34, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Very worthy individual but does not seem to have made an impact. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC).
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.