Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Lozito

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

=[[:William Lozito]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|William Lozito}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/William_Lozito Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|William Lozito}})

Doubtful notability, and I have AfDed his company too. Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Run-of-the-mill businessman. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 12:10, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 12:35, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 12:35, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

  • Weak keep. I think the references are just enough to pass. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 12:43, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:37, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:28, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

  • Keep Delete - meets GNG, but it does need to be rewritten into a neutral tone.

:I went about trying to rewrite the article, only to discover that the majority of references don't even discuss the subject of the article, they just talk about the effects of branding changes, in which it's not made clear whether the subject had any part in the decision or process.Orville1974 (talk) 14:27, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.