Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Raines

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 02:29, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

=[[William Raines]]=

:{{la|William Raines}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/William_Raines Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|William Raines}})

Believe that he fails :WP:NRU. He has only played U19, albeit for the national side. Perhaps a case of :WP:TOOSOON Gbawden (talk) 07:39, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter¹²³ (discourse) @ 21:52, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam ^Sing! 00:37, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Delete, from what I could find, there are insufficient reliable sources that give the subject in-depth or significant coverage. Therefore the subject appears to fail WP:GNG. Perhaps as the proposer says, it is WP:TOOSOON, and if a future editor can find reliable sources to show that the subject is notable than the article can be recreated.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 02:48, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.